Corinna Vinschen writes:
> Any string.  I guess that works because the string prefix is fixed.
> It's the name of the package.

True, it already knows that from setup.hint.  But then it's still a
difference from how setup.exe handles things.  Maybe I need to check
again because setup.exe could also know the name of the package when it
tries to extract the version from the filename.

>> I'd rather write new code when the objectives can be agreed upon.
>
> New code as in "new version checks for upset"?  Or as in "new upset
> from scratch"?

Both.  Let me get something going in genini and then try to transplant
it into upset.  A possible replacement for upset is at least a year
away, given how much (or rather little) time I can put into that at the
moment.

> Still, it would be helpful to have some perl guru understanding the
> code being able to describe it to a coder.

You've just described two persons.  Who's the sond one?  :-)


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds

Reply via email to