> If you would like to provide a list of packages, I think it makes sense > to save a bit of time and effort and bulk-approve many ruby-* adoptions, > assuming that you intend to do more, and all you are doing is just > updating the version and modernizing the cygport by adding an > appropriate license etc.
Yes, I intend to do so, so could you please approve the `ruby-*` adoptions? However, I would like to update these in the future only at the time of `ruby_xy` version upgrades. (except for security related issues). I think that this may be a low priority, since developers who want to use the latest gems will install them via `gem install` instead of via `setup.exe`. > Obviously, if there's anything you are uncertain of, or would just like > your changes reviewed, don't hesitate to ask here. Thank you for your concern. On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:28 PM Jon Turney <jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk> wrote: > > On 10/05/2023 15:24, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > On 09/05/2023 09:58, Daisuke Fujimura via Cygwin-apps wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> ==== > >> > >> Cygportfile: > >> - > >> https://cygwin.com/cgit/cygwin-packages/playground/tree/?h=ruby-debug_inspector > >> > >> Packages, logs: > >> - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4920404552 > > > > Looks good. I added this to your packages. > > > > Thanks. > > If you would like to provide a list of packages, I think it makes sense > to save a bit of time and effort and bulk-approve many ruby-* adoptions, > assuming that you intend to do more, and all you are doing is just > updating the version and modernizing the cygport by adding an > appropriate license etc. > > > Obviously, if there's anything you are uncertain of, or would just like > your changes reviewed, don't hesitate to ask here. >
