On Aug 8 10:06, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote: > Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > > > On Aug 7 16:07, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > > Minor issue found during tests of the upcoming 'peflags --timestamp' > > > patch. > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Christian > > > > > > ... > > > diff --git a/peflags.c b/peflags.c > > > index 93eaa0b..d98b121 100644 > > > --- a/peflags.c > > > +++ b/peflags.c > > > @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ > > > #include <unistd.h> > > > #include <getopt.h> > > > #include <errno.h> > > > -#include <limits.h> > > > #if defined (__CYGWIN__) || defined (__MSYS__) > > > #include <sys/mman.h> > > > #endif > > > @@ -598,7 +597,7 @@ handle_num_option (const char *option_name, > > > || sizeof_vals[option_index].value > 0x0000ffffffffffffULL > > > /* Just a ULONG value */ > > > || (sizeof_vals[option_index].is_ulong > > > - && sizeof_vals[option_index].value > ULONG_MAX)) > > > + && sizeof_vals[option_index].value > 0x00000000ffffffffULL)) > > What about using MAXDWORD or MAXULONG32 instead? > > Of course :-) > > Christian >
Pushed. I've started deploying a new release. Thanks! Corinna
