Charles Wilson wrote: > Okay, next attempt is up at > http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/autotools/ > the updated setup.ini file indicates the packages you should use for the > "new" version. > > Changes: > /usr/autotool/stable & /usr/autotool/devel > use stable version if VER <= 2.13, devel version else. > (Previously, used stable ver IFF VER == 2.13. Doh!) > split up my build script into separate ones so that single > packages can be built/tar'red/etc, instead of all-at-once. > > I haven't yet installed this or tested it, but I wanted to let you guys > know what was up before I went to bed. It's waaaaayyy late...
Okay, I've installed and tested these packages on my machine. They seem to work okay on a small test project -- both stable version and devel version. Also, all four packages perform as well as they each ever have on their own make check's: autoconf-2.13 : expected passes 226 unexpected failures 33 (*) autoconf-2.52 : All 155 tests successfull automake-1.4p5 : All 195 tests passed automake-1.5 : All 323 tests passed (*) This is the same as always. Note that I had the courtesan.com version of mktemp installed. Comments, anyone? Corinna, does this "release" address your concerns? --Chuck