I haven't tried any of them yet but searching sourceforge.net for indent provides several. The one that I plan to look at first is gindent but I haven't even downloaded yet.
Earnie. Robert Collins wrote: > The standard gnu indent is doing horrible things.. > > i.e. > > @@ -97,7 +102,8 @@ auth_retry: > > if (code < 200 || code >= 300) > { > - delete c; > + delete > + c; > return; > } > > Now, I'm of the opinion that second guessing your indent tool is a waste > of time - may as well not have one. > > However, I'm quite happy to use a different indent tool, that stays with > GNU indenting rules, but understands c++ well enough not to do the sort > of idiocy show above. > > I don't have the time to research a replacement just now, or to fix > indent itself, and it's a low priority - indent is consistent in what it > does, not random, so diffs should be small from now on in. > > If someone here can suggest a better indent.. I'll take a look. > Alternatively (preferred actually, but I don't wish to impinge on other > folks time) if someone wanted to hack indent to be c++ aware (ideally > including making things like headers with > #ifdef __cplusplus > extern "C" { > #endif > not indent the exported stuff.. that would be great. > > Rob _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com