Robert Collins wrote: > Chris, > How do you feel about making cygcheck a separate package to > cygwin1.dll. > > Why? becuase > a) it's reporting on setup.exe issues as well as pure cygwin1.dll issues > now. > b) Updating setup may therefore require updating cygcheck, and I don't > think that that should require updating 'cygwin'. > c) With dependencies theres no concern about cygcheck not getting > installed - just place it in base.
Why not extend this to all of winsup/utils? -- Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
