----- Original Message -----
From: "Gareth Pearce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:53 PM
Subject: choices (nano)


> Hi
>
> Seems my experiences with nano not compiling OOTB are somewhat less
then I
> was expecting ... I guess the stable branch really is more stable then
CVS
> ... :P
>
...
> Choices
> 1. with-included-gettext

Have a look at Chuck's readme in the gettext - it may cover this
already.

> 2. dodgy hack which I will fix up later when I understand m4 ...

This is appropriate, because as a packager you are taking responsibilty
to do this so that it works, as expected on cygwin.

Rob

Reply via email to