On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:23:51PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >Well, cygpath is wrong. cygcheck is wrong too, under this scenario, >but not quite as wrong since it at leasts puts the version in its own >string. I believe, it used to do something similar to cygpath but I >changed it, intending to, someday, make it use cvs versions.
Sorry, I forgot to use the word "IMO" in the above. Obviously there are one of many ways to do this. I think the "const char version[]" at the top and cvs id in the version is the best. However, I'm guilty of doing it the "wrong" way myself. cgf
