On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:23:21PM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote: >> This is consistent with the way the rest of cygwin works, however. The >> same argument could be applied to testing for ntsec. If this was an issue >> then we should be changing the fs information to reflect reparse points. > >I am not sure what is the conclusion here. Should I make it check for >FILE_SUPPORTS_SPARSE_FILES even though it can be inaccurate?
Yes. cgf
