On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:26:12PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >Here is a pretty simple patch..
Ok to include. >BTW, are there more questions about "[Patch]: Fixing the PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE >security hole (part 1)." from last week? Yes, actually. I am still puzzling over all of the extra logic that you pass in cygheap. I don't understand the need for special handling of children of the process that owns the controlling tty. However, I haven't had time to look at this in any great detail since I'm pursuing my own cygwin interests at the moment, when my real job doesn't interfere. Although in this case, I'm actually doing cygwin work for Red Hat but it's not my real job, but there is still potential revenue associated with it, but... cgf