On Mar 22 21:47, Gerd Spalink wrote: > > [From now on, the tests make *no* sound] > > > This is correct, since the following are the tests for audio > recording. They record whatever is at your currently > selected analog audio source (could be MIC, LINE, CD), > and silently ignore the recorded sound data.
Uh, ok, that makes sense. > > I'm not quite sure about putting the testcase into the testsuite. > > It's a good idea in general, but, well, I'm wondering if you'd > > like to use the libltp framework for the testresults, perhaps? > > > I agree. The printed results will be unambiguous, so no more > wondering about correctness or not. Cool. > Actually, I tried "indent" as distributed with cygwin, and it apparently > did strange things to the C++ code, e.g. "delete[] foo;" became "delete[]foo;" > I found also that the code in the class declarations looked worse than before. > Do you have a special set of options that work better than the default for C++? No, I don't. I had a bit weird results, too, so I just tweaked some lines by hand. Chris, do you have a personally approved set of indent options which give a useful result, perhaps? > > Since that code makes you to the one and only audio code maintainer > > for Cygwin, I'm wondering if you're also interested in maintaining > > some audio application which makes use of this new Cygwin code, > > as part of the Cygwin net distribution... > > > As far as my limited spare time allows... > Which applications were you thinking of? I have no idea! I thought you would know one, given that you cared for the dsp code in Cygwin. I've applied your patch. It will go into 1.5.10 already. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.