On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:32:51PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >Christopher Faylor schrieb: >>On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:36:17AM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >> >>>Why is this a bad idea? >> >>It's a very limited implementation of what sync is supposed to do but >>maybe it's better than nothing. >> >>A slightly more robust method would be to implement an internal cygwin >>signal which could be sent to every cygwin process telling it to run >>code like the below. > >A signal looks better. >Maybe just to its master process, and all its subprocesses and threads?
I don't know what you mean by the master process. It's easy to send signals to every cygwin process. You don't have to worry about threads. cgf