On Jan 22 16:03, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 03:58:45PM -0500, Bob Byrnes wrote: > >Our patches have been extensively tested, but we missed the problem > >that occurs for pending, nonblocking reads, because our automated > >builds don't use commands like sftp, unison, etc. Most of the other > >commands seem to use nonblocking I/O on pipes (often with select), and > >that works with my patches. > > Interesting stuff. I'm looking forward to seeing all of your patches > eventually. > > In the meantime, do yo have time to submit the short-circuiting patch that > you mentioned? I agree that it makes sense to do things that way.
Yes, that makes sense. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc.