On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:01:33AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On May 17 15:50, Brian Dessent wrote:
>> diff -u -r1.109 mmap.cc
>> --- mmap.cc 2 May 2005 03:50:07 -0000 1.109
>> +++ mmap.cc 17 May 2005 22:40:14 -0000
>> @@ -500,14 +500,14 @@
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static DWORD granularity = getshmlba ();
>> +
>> extern "C" void *
>> mmap64 (void *addr, size_t len, int prot, int flags, int fd, _off64_t off)
>> {
>> syscall_printf ("addr %x, len %u, prot %x, flags %x, fd %d, off %D",
>> addr, len, prot, flags, fd, off);
>>
>> - static DWORD granularity = getshmlba ();
>> -
>> /* Error conditions according to SUSv2 */
>> if (off % getpagesize ()
>> || (!(flags & MAP_SHARED) && !(flags & MAP_PRIVATE))
>>
>
>While this might help to avoid... something, I'm seriously wondering
>what's wrong with this expression. Why does each new version of gcc
>add new incompatibilities?
Well, it might actually be "a gcc bug".
cgf
