On Nov 27 10:17, Christopher Faylor wrote: > How about the alternative "Don't do that" approach? I think there are > other parts of the header files which won't work with -std=c89. I've > always been coding with the understanding that this is a GNU C environment.
Well, BSD and Linux are using the more portable approach. Why should Cygwin stand back? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
