On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 05:36:54PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 05:28:16AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>>My turn to say "ugh"! The wrapper function would translate down to a >>>single 'jmp' if -fno-omit-frame-pointer was in effect, but as things >>>stand it's a bit ugly. So maybe we should let both of these rest for a >>>while and see how things pan out upstream. >> >>Yes, sometimes we do ugly things in Cygwin to avoid slowdowns, even if >>it is to avoid a simple "jmp". > >Sure. So, let's leave this one out and wait for the bug to get fixed >in GCC.
Sounds good. Thanks, as always, for spending so much time dealing with this stuff. cgf
