On 9/3/2012 18:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Sep 3 17:34, JonY wrote: >> On 9/3/2012 11:05, Charles Wilson wrote: >>> On 9/2/2012 1:51 PM, Jin-woo Ye wrote: >>>> Now it is clear that this patch would be needed other relevant projects >>>> such as mingw, mingw-w64. thanks for your effort on simplified one. >>> >>> Yes, while it is not required that all of those systems stay exactly in >>> sync, there has been some effort in ensuring that the pseudo-reloc >>> implementation used by all three remains very similar if not identical. >>> >>> Please bring this patch to the attention of the mingw.org and >>> mingw64.sf.net people, if it's not too much trouble. >>> >>> -- >>> Chuck >>> >>> >>> >> >> Original message already forwarded to mingw-w64 devel list. Thanks >> Jin-woo Ye. > > Do you want the patch I eventually applied, too? > > > Corinna >
Yeah, that will be good too. I forwarded the CVS commit message too. I'm not sure if anybody else is more suited to comment on it than Kai, he is still on vacation though.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
