On Mar 21 17:30, Peter Foley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Peter Foley <pefol...@pefoley.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Corinna Vinschen > > <corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com> wrote: > >> Still hmm at this point. AFAICS we only need the handful of definitions > >> for new and delete operators, nothing else. Is there perhaps a way to > >> define this stuff by ourselves to avoid any requirement for libstdc++ > >> headers for building the DLL? Or is that just not feasible? > > It is possible to avoid including libstdc++ headers, but since > cygserver.exe links against > libstdc++, we'd still need to build libstdc++, and we still have the > mingw-crt headers dependency. > So I'm not sure there's really any point essentially in-lining part of > libstdc++'s new header so that we > can build without libstdc++.
Ok. Thanks for checking. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
