On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:57:06 +0200 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Sep 12 03:37, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-patches wrote: > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:38:43 +0900 > > Takashi Yano via Cygwin-patches <cygwin-patches@cygwin.com> wrote: > > > How about the patch attached? > > > I think this is safer than previous patch. > > > > I have revised this patch to fit current git head, and submit > > to cygwin-patches@cygwin.com. > > Thanks, but I didn't apply this one because it doesn't really make sense > to go to the extra effort to support outdated and incompatible codepages > we don't handle as Cygwin codeset at all. IMHO it's not worth to call > another MBTWC just to check if a codepage supports the MB_ERR_INVALID_CHARS > flag.
I have checked which codepage does not support MB_ERR_INVALID_CHARS. The result is as follows. 42 50220 50221 50222 50225 50227 50229 52936 57002 57003 57004 57005 57006 57007 57008 57009 57010 57011 65000 If all of these are not worth for everyone, I agree with you. -- Takashi Yano <takashi.y...@nifty.ne.jp>
