On 9/17/2020 2:29 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
Based on thread https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2020-September/246318.html
enumerate Vista, 7, 8, 10 progression to be clear, and earliest server 2008
---
winsup/doc/faq-what.xml | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/winsup/doc/faq-what.xml b/winsup/doc/faq-what.xml
index ea8496ccbc65..09747532c2e8 100644
--- a/winsup/doc/faq-what.xml
+++ b/winsup/doc/faq-what.xml
@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ They can be used from one of the provided Unix shells like
bash, tcsh or zsh.
<question><para>What versions of Windows are supported?</para></question>
<answer>
-<para>Cygwin can be expected to run on all modern, released versions of Windows.
-State January 2016 this includes Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008 and all
-later versions of Windows up to Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016.
+<para>Cygwin can be expected to run on all modern, released versions of
Windows,
+from Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10, Windows Server 2008, and all
+later versions of Windows.
The 32 bit version of Cygwin also runs in the WOW64 32 bit environment on
released 64 bit versions of Windows, the 64 bit version of course only on
64 bit Windows.
Since this is something that changes over time, I don't think you should drop
the date completely, though I see no reason to retain "January 2016". What
would you think of revising your patch so that the text says something like this:
"Cygwin can be expected to run on all modern, released versions of Windows. As
of September 2020 this includes Windows Vista, 7, 8, 8.1, and 10, Windows Server
2008, and all later versions of Windows Server."
Ken
