On 06/06/2025 02:50, John Haugabook wrote:
Hello,

I made a few small edits to the website, and included the patch as an
attachment. Below are the changes:

Thanks very much for looking at this. Our website certainly needs some love!

  - Changed links to template elements to absolute, using "/" before the page.

OK. But why?

I know there's a random mix of absolute and relative paths, but why change them all to absolute?

(Note that the whole website is also exposed at https://sourceware.org/cygwin/, but doesn't work properly because of absolute paths...)

  - Included template elements in nested pages.
  - Made an edit to "Install.html".

-<code>-P package1,package2,...</code> options.
+<code>-P &lt;package1&gt; -P &lt;package2&gt;,...</code> options.

Is this reflecting that the first syntax doesn't work for you? I think it's supposed to, so that would be a bug in setup if it doesn't.

I'm not sure that assuming the reader knows that "enclosed in angle brackets means a metasyntactic variable" is a good idea.

Perhaps it's enough to italicize these to indicate they are replaceable?

  - In style.css edited elements for better UX, and edited comment
markers for consistency, ending at col 78 for comments marking style
section.

I applied the change to align the comment ends, because that's just terrible currently. :(

Not sure what to do about consistency in placing the brace after the selector and indentation of the declarations.

There's also a script.js added to navbar.html which does something, but I can't tell what at a glance, so that will have to wait until I have more time to look at it...

I wasn’t sure where website suggestions should be sent — this list
seemed most appropriate, given its name. If there’s a better place or
process to submit patches like this, please feel free to redirect me.

This is totally the appropriate place to send patches.

Totally understand if the changes are rejected or revised. Thank you
for maintaining the project and reviewing contributions.

Thanks again.

In future, if possible, please try to submit a set of patches each covering a separate change which can be understood in isolation, it makes it a lot easier to review (and lets us immediately apply uncontroversial changes while discussing the other parts).

Reply via email to