On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:14:53PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >>I'm glad it sounds logical. Cygwin already has lots of code that is NT >>specific, e.g., CYGWIN=ntsec. > >I agree. I got the impression from Corinna's email that what Ralf was >suggesting needed a 9x equivalent to be seriously considered. I'm not >100% sure why I got that impression though....
Ok. The horse is starting to decompose. I'm not going to whack it anymore. This is all actually off-topic for this mailing list anyway. I assume that Suhaib and Harold are just being too polite to inform us of that fact. cgf