Jehan, > A static would do the job but, by personnally, I don't like static in a > function. It's easy to miss the "static" keyword when reading the code > which then make it hard to understand (or at least, I missed it. Several > times already I spent a few hours to try to understand why the code was > working just because I missed it :p).
Okay, I have implemented a new convention: static variable names are now prefixed with 's_', just like globals are prefixed with 'g_'. I've updated all files in the hw/xwin directory and I'll submit that patch to XFree86. Harold
