Chris, > >>Doh. system_printf != syscall_printf. I've checked in a fix > >>and am rebuilding the snapshot. > > > >And, additionally, I put Pierre's patch in the wrong place in the code. > >Sigh. I had to interpret it because the formatting was GNU standard and > >I interpreted it wrong. > > > >This snapshot was hosed. I'm regenerating it *again*. > > The new snapshot is available.
I'm home now. I'll have to wait until tomorrow to test the new snapshot, when I have access to the strange machine. Harold
