On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:35:34PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: >> Since I don't accept the word of every person with a web site out there >> who thinks they are compliant with the GPL, I don't see why I should accept >> the words of a screen. Is there an independent corroboration of this >> anywhere? >> > >See what trolltech says about this >http://www.trolltech.com/developer/licensing/index.html > >"The Qt Free Edition (version 2.2 and later) is released under the Open Source >license QPL, and GPL. The Qt Free Edition may be freely copied and distributed, >put on ftp-sites and CD-ROMs etc. Qt Free Edition is provided with no warranty >and no support." > >What do you wan't more ?
Ok. I yield. I'll accept that the licensing for this package is in compliance with Cygwin's. Thanks for humoring me. cgf