Harold
Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
You're correct, I should have said 'product foo'...
I took Microsoft as example because it was the first company I had in
mind. I don't have anything against Microsoft, otherwise I wouldn't use
Cygwin ;)
In the company I'm working now, almost every network TCP port is
customized. What I wanted to say is :
If the port 1234 is used with some X servers with XDMCP and it crashes,
some online customer helpdesk will say : "You don't use standard XDMCP
port, I can't do anything for you. Get lost." I don't want Cygwin-Xfree
to do the same.
--- Harold L Hunt II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Okay, okay, but I didn't want to be that hard on Sylvain as he is a
good contributor to our discussions... I just wanted to put up a friendly reminder that everyone, I more so than others, should sometimes tone down our messages. That's all.
Harold
Christopher Faylor wrote:
defaultOn Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 04:33:26PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:I am not understanding why your response was appropriate. The
wouldport for XDM has nothing to do with Microsoft, unless Microsoft hasdecided to use port 177 for one of their products. If that was thecase, then a simple mention that ``Product Foo'' uses port 177
have been sufficient, right?AFAICT, it's the standard Cygwin response #13, issued when someoneisconfused about the process and wants to make a point by lettingeveryoneknow how bad Microsoft is and exhorting all of us not to be thatway.In other words, it was a value-free message. Alexander's responsewasperfectly clear and he didn't need to be taken to task for someimaginedattitude. cgf
=====
Sylvain Petreolle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fight against Spam ! http://www.euro.cauce.org/en/index.html
ICQ #170597259
"Don't think you are. Know you are." Morpheus in Matrix, chapter 15.
___________________________________________________________
Soyez solidaire soutenez l’action du Téléthon avec Yahoo! France.
http://www1.telethon.fr/030-Espace-Relais-Dons/webtirelire1.asp?hebergeur_id=1309