J S wrote:
> Sorry I didn't realise what ls_netdev was before. I will try it tomorrow
> when I go back to work.

Maybe this will bring some light to the problem.

> Anything suspicious there?

Only that the dll reports more accourate values than ls_netdev *g*

bye
    ago

Hi Alex,

Here's the output I got from running ls_netdex on windows 95:

$ ls_netdev-w95
ls_netdev $Id: ls_netdev.c,v 1.6 2002/11/10 16:14:32 ago Exp $
OS Version: Windows 9x 4.0 Build 67306684 B
Querying devices using ioctl
lo: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=127.0.0.1
eth0: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=0.0.0.0
ppp0: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=0.0.0.0
lo: metric=1 mtu=3924
eth0: metric=1 mtu=1500
ppp0: metric=1 mtu=1500
Querying devices using internal function
ifname: "0000"
driver: "NetTrans\0002"
IPAddress: "0.0.0.0", IPMask: "0.0.0.0"
AdapterName: ""
ifname: "0002"
driver: "NetTrans\0008"
IPAddress: "0.0.0.0", IPMask: "0.0.0.0"
AdapterName: "MS$PPP"
lo: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=127.0.0.1
eth0: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=0.0.0.0
ppp0: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=0.0.0.0

Thanks for your help.

JS.

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

Reply via email to