Yes, We have ML. and this issue has been discussed for a month.
and we found that the key problem is we dont know graphics stuff so much.
you dont have an interest for usage of Cygwin/X?
I think one of the biggest usage of Cygwin/X is for coLinux, possibly.
then, I think it is not wrong to discuss it here...
--- Okajima.
>On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 09:02:19AM +0900, Digital Infra, Inc. wrote:
>>We are making graphics support of coLinux.
>>(coLinux is an emulator to run Linux as a Win32 app).
>>
>>there are many ways -
>>
>>1. coLinux FB
>>2. DirectFB/SDL
>>3. VNC
>>4. Cygwin/X
>>5. Mingw X
>>
>>Each way has each charactaristics and pros and cons. then, I need your
>>opinion. probably you advocate Cygwin/X very much. but it is ok. any
>>information is welcome. anything is better than nothing. of course,
>>fair comparison is better.
>
>I'm not sure that this mailing list is the best forum for this
>discussion. This is a forum for discussing cygwin/X. It is not a forum
>for discussing coLinux or how to implement X in coLinux.
>
>I assume that your project has mailing lists. I would rather see this
>topic discussed in the coLinux lists. Feel free to let people know
>where they can discuss this in your mailing list but I would rather not
>have the Cygwin/X discussion diverted to implementation details for
>another package.
>
>Thanks
>--
>Christopher Faylor spammer? -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cygwin Co-Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>TimeSys, Inc.
>
