-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian Ford wrote: > Why do you propose keeping a distinct X11R6 tree yet puting documentation > outside it. I would prefer these to be consistent.
FWIW, Debian and Gentoo both do as proposed. > IIRC, Harold had decided to eliminate the X11R6 subtree and cgf agreed. I > guess that was the direction Xorg and several Linux distros were taking. Gentoo did this already with X11R6.8.2. I would agree, with the upcoming modular, autotooled X11R7, that the whole reason for the /usr/X11R6 exception to the FHS no longer applies. > IMHO, that was not desirable. Eventually I could imagine X11 and > Cygwin native versions of the same package. I liked this method of making > the distinction. What does "Cygwin native" mean? If Cygwin is meant to be a POSIX environment, then X11 should be the standard for GUI apps. Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDSxA9piWmPGlmQSMRAuwZAKDT0/fkqzHEkuTcXba3eAq5ugQdEwCfdFmN 7TlTParj9ElUf0IGi1wFWVc= =5BME -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/