Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2007, Charles Wilson wrote:
The fact is, rxvt upstream is dead, dead, dead. It has shuffled off
this mortal coil. Joined the choir invisible. It is an EX-terminal.
The terminal is terminal.
thanks for agreeing with me. It has no maintainer.
Not so fast, Thomas. I did not and do not agree with your previous
posts: neither of your messages claimed that "upstream rxvt has no
maintainer". (If they did, then I would have agreed with that.) Your
messages claimed that rxvt had no cygwin maintainer. That claim is
false: I am the cygwin maintainer for rxvt.
Don't try to retcon this thread.
Frankly, I prefer rxvt-unicode on X -- even in non-unicode mode --
because
yes (does cygwin finally have unicode support? - no one's mentioned it
on this list at all).
No, cygwin does not. Cygwin's rxvt-unicode port has limited unicode
support because Thomas Wolff provided me with a patch (to rxvt-unicode)
that shims unicode support by intercepting certain X calls.
--
Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/
