On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Jon TURNEY <jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk> wrote: > > Making startxwin.bat just launch startx or xinit would also largely solve > the problem of overwriting people's customisations to startxwin.bat, as it > has defined places to put those.
I would like to point out that currently, it appears that in the eyes of the average user (like me?), startx does not produce acceptable results, as was just discussed here: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2009-02/msg00165.html so making startxwin.bat a wrapper around startx would potentially create a problem for many users, who, mind you, were already forced to waste some time in finding a workaround to the unfortunate fact that startx stopped working after "up" grade to xorg :( --Dan -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/