On Oct 5 17:46, Yaakov S wrote: > On 05/10/2009 13:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> --- sys.c.ORIG 2009-10-05 19:23:58.000000000 +0200 >> +++ sys.c 2009-10-05 19:18:34.000000000 +0200 >> @@ -408,7 +408,11 @@ openTty(char *line) >> int rc; >> int tty = -1; >> >> +#ifdef __CYGWIN__ >> + tty = open(line, O_RDWR); >> +#else >> tty = open(line, O_RDWR | O_NOCTTY); >> +#endif > > For portability, perhaps this should also be #ifdef TIOCSCTTY, if these two > sections go hand-in-hand?
Sure, sounds much better than #ifdef __CYGWIN__. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/