On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 07:53:53AM -0400, Suhaib Siddiqi wrote: > I agree with Chris, keep using XWIN and do not worry about trademark. >Startnet does not own it. Thier product is X-Win32, which is different, >there is X-WinPro and XWIN is an abrivation of XWIN. I did a brief search >long time ago before naming executable xwin. I am not an attorney but I >think using name XWIN is safe, as Chris mentioned. I was almost tempted to suggest cygxwin but the "cyg" prefix is sort of deprecated these days, so it wouldn't make much sense to go in that direction. cgf
- Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Harold Hunt
- Re: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Christopher Faylor
- Re: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Andrew Markebo
- RE: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Robert Collins
- RE: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Harold Hunt
- RE: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Robert Collins
- RE: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Harold Hunt
- Re: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Robert Collins
- RE: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Suhaib Siddiqi
- RE: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components 'Christopher Faylor '
- RE: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Suhaib Siddiqi
- RE: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Suhaib Siddiqi
- RE: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Suhaib Siddiqi
- RE: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Suhaib Siddiqi
- Re: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Andrew Markebo
- RE: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Suhaib Siddiqi
- Re: Naming of Cygwin/XFree86 components Robert Collins