Tim Prince wrote: > > The most recent success story I have heard, with a modified cygwin1.dll (not > supported on this list) was with XP Server build 3505. My last success > with a Pro build was with build 2446. These builds have changed continually > in the details relevant to cygwin, which must be one of the strategies > employed by Microsoft to discourage use of cygwin.
Maybe I'm begin naive, but I don't think MS gives a rat's #!&# about cygwin -- certainly not enough to deliberately modify things just to screw us up. I mean, c'mon, we're not Lotus... fork/exec is pretty hard to get "right" -- even when you throw thousands of code monkeys at the problem. I'm not surprised that things are fluid... --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/