Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Do we already have -src packages that adhere to this new convention? Yep. mktemp. automake, automake-devel, automake-stable, autoconf, autoconf-devel, autoconf-stable, cygutils, ... > If it's not too late, it would be very nice if they could be > distinguished from the old, prepatched -src packages, by using a > different naming convention, ie foo-1.1-cyg.tar.gz? probably too late -- and besides, I don't think setup/upset are prepared for source packages that don't end in -src. But why should they be distinguished? It's up to the maintainer of each package to keep track...non-maintainers who want to build it personally should just download and follow the instructions. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/