Jason Tishler writes: >> >So, the options passed to ld are the same for cygcurl-2.dll and pq.dll >except for the slight variation of --base-file versus --image-base. > >I decided to table the search for the "offending" ld option(s) because >of the following gloomy thought: > > Given that rebase can break certain DLLs and that it is nearly > impossible to control how arbitrary packages create their DLLs, > can setup.exe's proposed rebase solution deal with this problem? > Or, is the rebase solution doomed to failure? > >Does anyone have any bright ideas?
What happens if you link with --enable-auto-image-base ?? Cheers Norman -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
