At 02:52 PM 2/14/2002, Joel P. Kuntz wrote: >Good Afternoon, > > I certainly hope this is one of those intelligent questions. I work >at the University at Buffalo. We have been experimenting with cygwin >to provide a sshd on machines so we can do remote administration on our >servers securely. We also happen to be running Norton Antivirus >Corporate Edition 7.x. > > The latest definition files dated February 13, 2002 indicate that >cygwin1.dll and cygz.dll are EggHead viruses. I think it is a false >positive. Has anyone else reported this?
Um, yes. With nauseating repetition. I'd suggest that if you're unsure whether you're asking an intelligent question or not, particularly about a new (to you) issue, the first place to look is the email list archives. Common problems are going to show up there in droves. In the case of this particular issue, you would see the entire debate on this issue over just the past two days. Given Norton's obvious error, it looks like we'll be seeing lots of repeated email queries to this list about this issue. :-( Time for me to set up a new email filter! ;-) Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/