> >Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: > >>Thank goodness someone has found the Cygwin release that's a panacea for >>all >>subsequent Cygwin ills! I'd heard B20 touted as this for so long that I >>was >>afraid Cygwin would never reach such heights again. Boy am I relieved! I >>guess there's no need for further Cygwin releases, since 1.3.9 is now the >>cure all (actually, this makes me wonder why there were any releases after >>B20....) Anybody have any idea what would be a good use of the newly >>freed >>up time of members of this group? > > >LOL! > >Although, the XEmacs-centric crowd has been recommending "stay at 1.3.2" >for some time, now. So unfortunately, 1.3.9 is NOT a complete panacea. >We *may* actually have to keep developing cygwin...mebbe 1.3.11 will be >all the juicy goodness of 1.3.2 + 1.3.9, and then we can stop? > >--Chuck >
surely you mean 2.6.11 - which will be released before the sun goes red giant ... but not by very long. _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/