On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:57:31AM -0500, Robinow, David wrote:
> Well, I'm somewhat to blame for this situation.
> See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-09/msg00010.html
>
> Is the suggestion of "include <winsock.h>" reasonable?
No. IIRC, this caused problems. See the following:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2000-q4/msg00016.html
Jason
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
