cgf wrote: > I assume that one possible reason is that the copy-on-write fork may be > somehow bypassing normal in-memory sharing of text segments but I never > knew for sure. >
Have either of you tried this comparison on XP, to see if it's any different there? I'm running XP here, if Chris J. wants to put the c-o-w DLL up somewhere so I can download it and try it. -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/