Dave Korn-6 wrote: > > Ghastly top-heavy over-engineered UML-laden bloatware that comes with > its > own non-standard filing system does tend to make me do that ;-) > There's a gem well hidden inside.
Dave Korn-6 wrote: > > That'll teach you to choose the wrong side in the One True Editor wars! > Emacs is not an editor: I told you it is the shell that dies... Are you using the vi shell? Dave Korn-6 wrote: > > It should suffice to exit all cygwin processes, but don't forget that > includes any cygwin services you've got running. > OK. It does. Without CYGWIN=tty, I get the output to the console. What shall I miss without it? http://old.nabble.com/file/p26770960/cygcheck.srvc cygcheck.srvc Dave Korn-6 wrote: > > Try 'stty sane', typing blind if you have to? > I have bad memories of 'stty sane'. OK, it was on hpux... But it wasn't sane. Anyway, tried now, and no: didn't work. I tried with Enter, Ctrl-J, Ctrl-M/Ctrl-J, and finally, I had to kill xterm. Here is my cygcheck output (I just updated, and checked the problem is the same). Thanks, Marc -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Looking-for-the-%27stdout%27-of-a-Windows-application-tp26769438p26770960.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple