On 6/30/2010 6:52 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Andy Koppe!
C:/bin on /usr/bin type ntfs (binary,auto)
C:/lib on /usr/lib type ntfs (binary,auto)
C: on / type ntfs (binary,auto)
Urgh. I hope you know what you're doing...
Yeah, I do trust the Cygwin package maintainers not to overwrite
/Windows or /Users.
Actually that was a reference to C:/bin being a pointer to /usr/bin instead
of /bin In normal installation it is that way plus /usr/bin as symlink to
/bin Not the other way around. (sh is in /bin, with your structure, no way it
could be reached through C:/bin )
Actually, what Andy has is what 'setup.exe' provides if you install in
'C:\'. I have the same thing. So what he has is a "normal installation"
if the user chooses to install in 'C:\'. Also, FWIW, 'setup.exe' does not
create a "symlink" from '/usr/bin' to '/bin'. It only creates the mounts
like what Andy shows above.
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
