> You seem to be approaching this problem as if people will say "Ah! > Stability issues! Right. Well, ok, here's what you need to know." >
It's not me thinking in the bug -> solution pattern here. I don't ask for a solution. > > If you think that asking a group of strangers for help with a nebulously > defined "instability" is really going to get you any useful responses > then you must not be well-acquainted with open source. > I ask for an estimation. I ask people that work intensively with Cygwin, to have a second opinion. Then I can compare it to the non-cygwin-advocates. So please don't take it the wrong way. I don't want to start a flame. Would be the wrong place anyway. :-) > As a project lead, here's my advice: If you are concerned that Cygwin is > unstable then buy support from Red Hat. Then you have a guaranteed > recourse if something doesn't work. If I would sell closed source product, instead of devolping an OS one. ... but than I could advice the customer to buy the Interix layer instead. Al -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple