That brings up a couple of questions:

1) I've found several web sites that offer a GSL package for 1.7 but
why isn't it part of the library full install?
2) Is there a "canonical" place to look for packages not in the install options?


On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Marco Atzeri <marco_atz...@yahoo.it> wrote:
> --- Ven 1/10/10, Jan Chludzinski  ha scritto:
>
>> I need to write some simple code
>> which involves complex values.  I
>> remembered that C99 added support for complex values and
>> tried to use
>> <complex.h> (different from C++'s <complex>) -
>> I tried ccos() and got
>> the error below.
>>
>> Another option is to use GLS?
>
> GLS seems the easy way.
> newlib is not C99 complete for complex numbers
>
> Marco
>
>>
>> ---John
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Marco Atzeri <marco_atz...@yahoo.it>
>> wrote:
>> > --- Gio 30/9/10, Jan Chludzinski  ha scritto:
>> >
>> >> After doing some web searches for
>> >> <complex.h> and Cygwin, I found
>> >> there doesn't seem to be any support unless I
>> use: gcc
>> >> -I/usr/include/mingw -lm tc.c  But I still end up
>> with:
>> >>
>> >>
>> /cygdrive/c/DOCUME~1/JOHNC~1.ECS/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccAPGnIv.o:tc.c:(.text+0x3d):
>> >> undefined reference to `_ccos'
>> >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> >>
>> >> I'm really not interested in working with MinGW
>> either.
>> >>  All the
>> >> messages about <complex.h> and Cygwin are
>> rather old
>> >> (<2007) so I was
>> >> hoping that 1.7 would remedy the problem.
>>  Evidently not?
>> >>
>> >> ---John
>> >>
>> >
>> > John,
>> > newlib (cygwin libc-like library) has not the complex
>> type,
>> > however on cygwin complex numbers are supported by
>> > the gcc/g++ compiler
>> >
>> >
>> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/include/c++/complex.h
>> >
>> > what are exactly your needs ?
>> >
>> > Marco

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply via email to