On 11/3/2010 10:10 AM, Lee Maschmeyer wrote:
Hmm. Is that really the best approach unless absolutely necessary? "That
doesn't work so do something else" has always struck me as a less than ideal
approach to debugging. :-) Is it possible that caml could be repaired so it
doesn't depend on GCC4?
I'm not sure "repaired" is the right word for this but I expect it would be
possible to do this. I'm not sure anyone would consider it worth the time
though. Presumably, some older release of ocaml would build with gcc-3,
though I think you're heading in the wrong direction if you have as a goal
to avoid build problems in the future. But if you are intent on going this
route, you might find downgrading your ocaml packages to 3.08 will help
side-step the issue. Given it's age, I would be surprised if it were built
with gcc-4, though I didn't actually check that.
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
