On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 01:31:15PM +0000, NightStrike wrote: >On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Marco Atzeri <marco_atz...@yahoo.it> wrote: >> and Atlas is so deep unix related, that is better to use > >Does this imply that a direct mingw port is not feasible without >extensive effort?
Can we terminate this discussion now? It hasn't really been on-topic for some time and speculation about whether a mingw port is feasible is really not fodder for this mailing list. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
