On 3/24/2011 6:11 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 02:43, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 2 18:01, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
Hi;
I get the following error output when opening a terminator (enclosed
at bottom of the email).
This is the jessies.org terminator, not the gnome terminator.
Now I don't get the following when I open a cygwin prompt.
So I thought it might be a terminator thing.
I had just updated to 1.78 of Cygwin.
So updated to the most current version of terminator.
Same problem.
So I posted to the terminator email list (terminator-us...@googlegroups.com).
The terminator developer/maintainer was able to reproduce the
problem and thinks that the error is within cygwin and suggests this
patch (between the splat-asterisk lines).
Thanks,
Ken Wolcott
*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&
I wouldn't like to claim this is the right fix but it lets that
trivial example link:
$ gcc strerror.c
$ diff -u /usr/include/string.h.orig /usr/include/string.h
--- /usr/include/string.h.orig 2011-03-02 10:49:29.510836800 -0800
+++ /usr/include/string.h 2011-03-02 10:50:04.324450800 -0800
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
char *_EXFUN(strerror_r,(int, char *, size_t));
#else
# ifdef __GNUC__
-int _EXFUN(strerror_r,(int, char *, size_t)) __asm__ ("__xpg_strerror_r");
+int _EXFUN(strerror_r,(int, char *, size_t)) __asm__
("___xpg_strerror_r");
# else
int _EXFUN(__xpg_strerror_r,(int, char *, size_t));
# define strerror_r __xpg_strerror_r
$
Thanks for the report. I just fixed that in CVS. The problem here
is that we have to take several targets into account, some of them
using a labe lprefix, some of them not. I applied a patch which
does that:
int _EXFUN(strerror_r,(int, char *, size_t)) __asm__ (__ASMNAME
("__xpg_strerror_r"));
The __ASMNAME macro is now defined in cdefs.h. I tested to build
a testcase which calls the POSIX version of strerror_r and it now
works fine. Well, there was a small bug in __xpg_strerror_r, too,
but that should be fixed in CVS as well. I'll create a new developer
snapshot later today.
Thanks again,
Corinna
Hi Corinna;
The problem seems to be fixed now (after a recent update).
uname.exe -a
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 KWOLCOTT-T61 1.7.8(0.236/5/3) 2011-03-01 09:36 i686 Cygwin
Since Corinna replied on 3/3 and your Cygwin DLL version was built on 3/1,
I think it's fair to assume that you don't have the change she was talking
about. But you can get an updated Cygwin DLL with the change by visiting
<http://cygwin.com/snapshots/>.
--
Larry
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
