On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:47:39AM +0200, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote: >Hi, > >1) It seems that we have management problems with the snapshots. >The last one (indicated 2011-05-04 01:02:18 UTC) belongs in >fact to 2011-05-05,
That has been fixed. Thanks for the heads up. and it is more recent than the preceding >snapshot (indicated yesterday 2011-05-04 06:xx:xx UTC), which has >now disappeared (diffs are shown against 20110502). > >In the past, at least for 2011-03-09 and for 2011-03-23 already, two >snapshots were produced on the same day and the first one in the day >has disappeared. That's how it works. Only one snapshot per day. >If possible, make the date indicated in the snapshot page to be >the same as the date indicated in `uname -a'. Or otherwise to >minimize discrepancies. Not gonna happen. The date indicates the time when the file was uploaded. Having it reflect the uname would require unpacking a tar file and inspecting cygwin1.dll. I'm not interested in going to that amount of work. >2) More importantly, i was not able to compile snapshots since about >beginning of May, with an error: wchar.h not found (in lsaauth). >The snapshot 20110420 has compiled correctly at that time (say: 21/4); >but i was not able to recompile it recently. You must know that >i update the cygwin packages every day, therefore the problem probably >comes from a recently added package. Snapshots are provided "as-is". If you can't compile it then PTC. >3) And last, the last snapshot (20110504 01:02:18 UTC) does not work for me, >see eg >% /usr/bin/flex /dev/null >...does not finish >% This should be fixed in... the latest snapshot. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
