> Because our gcc maintainer went missing. We hope Dave is ok, as we have > had no word from him. However, in the meantime, we've had another > person (Yaakov) volunteer to pick up the slack; the recent release of an > updated GMP package were requested by the new volunteer to facilitate > the upcoming release of gcc-$newer. > >Be patient.
I'm thankful that Cygwin exists and is the great product it is! BUT, I just have an issue with GCC 4.3. I compiled some terse numerical (~1500 lines worth) and got one set of answers (using g++) and I got another set of answers using MinGW with 4.5. The MinGW results were what I expect - the same as I got using SuSE 11.4 with g++ 4.6. Also, the values I get using VC++ 2010. Haven't had time to wade through the ~1500 lines of Runge-Kutta code to find the needle-in-the-haystack. ---Jan On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Jan Chludzinski <jan.chludzin...@gmail.com> wrote: > The latest version of GCC is 4.6. The version used with MinGW is 4.5. > Cygwin uses 4.3. > > Why is Cygwin 3 versions behind? > > ---Jan > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple