On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:20:49PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: >On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:54:23AM -0800, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: >>>"Christopher Faylor" wrote: >>>> >>>> In the meantime, if people are piling on to suggest this because they >>>> think it will cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something >>>> please be assured that this will not happen. >>> >>>OK, what would cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something? >> >> There is nothing in what I wrote which would suggest that adding xinit as >> a dependency was a possibility. > >I agree with Matt. If TK is requiring the use of the X server then >the X server should be a package dependency of TK. It wasn't a >dependency before because the X server wasn't needed but now the X >server is needed to use TK.
TK does not require an X server running on the same system. This has been explained in this very thread. If you have points to make, don't make them with a <aol>"me too"</aol> unless you're planning on addressing the issues that Yaakov raised. Otherwise you're just wasting bandwidth. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple